Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Low birth weight, maternal birth-spacing decisions, and future reproduction.Tamas Bereczkei, Adam Hofer & Zsuzsanna Ivan - 2000 - Human Nature 11 (2):183-205.
    The aim of this study is an analysis of the possible adaptive consequences of delivery of low birth weight infants. We attempt to reveal the cost and benefit components of bearing small children, estimate the chance of the infants’ survival, and calculate the mothers’ reproductive success. According to life-history theory, under certain circumstances mothers can enhance their lifetime fitness by lowering the rate of investment in an infant and/or enhancing the rate of subsequent births. We assume that living in a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Low birth weight, intrauterine growth-retarded, and pre-term infants.Troy D. Abell - 1992 - Human Nature 3 (4):335-378.
    Low birth weight, intrauterine growth retardation, and prematurity are overwhelming risk factors associated with infant mortality and morbidity. The lack of efficacious prenatal screening tests for these three outcomes illuminates the problems inherent in bivariate estimates of association. A biocultural strategy for research is presented, integrating societal and familial levels of analysis with the metabolic, immune, vascular, and neuroendocrine systems of the body. Policy decisions, it is argued, need to be based on this type of biocultural information in order to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Energy metabolism and the evolution of reproductive suppression in the human female.Grazyna Jasienska - 2003 - Acta Biotheoretica 51 (1):1-18.
    Reproduction places severe demands on the energy metabolism in human females. When physical work entails higher energy expenditure, not enough energy will be left for the support of the reproductive processes and temporal suppression of the reproductive function is expected. While energy needed for reproduction may be obtained by increases in energy intake, utilization of fat reserves, or reallocation of energy from basal metabolism, several environmental or physiological constraints render such solutions unlikely. For human ancestors increases in energy intake were (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization.James S. Chisholm - 1996 - Human Nature 7 (1):1-37.
    Life history theory’s principle of allocation suggests that because immature organisms cannot expend reproductive effort, the major trade-off facing juveniles will be the one between survival, on one hand, and growth and development, on the other. As a consequence, infants and children might be expected to possess psychobiological mechanisms for optimizing this trade-off. The main argument of this paper is that the attachment process serves this function and that individual differences in attachment organization (secure, insecure, and possibly others) may represent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Evolutionary and ecological aspects of early brain malnutrition in humans.William D. Lukas & Benjamin C. Campbell - 2000 - Human Nature 11 (1):1-26.
    This article reviews the effects of malnutrition on early brain development using data generated from animal experiments and human clinical studies. Three related processes, each with their own functional consequences, are implicated in the alteration of brain development. (1) Maternal undernutrition at the start of pregnancy results in reduced transfer of nutrients across the placenta, allowing the conservation of effort for future reproductive episodes. (2) Differential allocation to growing organs by the fetus in response to nutritional stress spares the brain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Greater Loss of Female Embryos During Human Pregnancy: A Novel Mechanism.John F. Mulley - 2019 - Bioessays 41 (11):1900063.
    Given an equal sex ratio at conception, the excess of human males at birth can only be explained by greater loss of females during pregnancy. It is proposed that the bias against females during human development is the result of a greater degree of genetic and metabolic “differentness” between female embryos and maternal tissues than for similarly aged males, and that successful implantation and placentation represents a threshold dichotomy, where the acceptance threshold shifts depending on maternal condition, especially stress. Right (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark