Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. There is no evidence that meaning maps capture semantic information relevant to gaze guidance: Reply to Henderson, Hayes, Peacock, and Rehrig (2021).Marek A. Pedziwiatr, Matthias Kümmerer, Thomas S. A. Wallis, Matthias Bethge & Christoph Teufel - 2021 - Cognition 214 (C):104741.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Finding the meaning in meaning maps: Quantifying the roles of semantic and non-semantic scene information in guiding visual attention.Maarten Leemans, Claudia Damiano & Johan Wagemans - 2024 - Cognition 247 (C):105788.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Realistic About Reference Production: Testing the Effects of Domain Size and Saturation.Ruud Koolen & Emiel Krahmer - 2024 - Cognitive Science 48 (6):e13473.
    Experiments on visually grounded, definite reference production often manipulate simple visual scenes in the form of grids filled with objects, for example, to test how speakers are affected by the number of objects that are visible. Regarding the latter, it was found that speech onset times increase along with domain size, at least when speakers refer to nonsalient target objects that do not pop out of the visual domain. This finding suggests that even in the case of many distractors, speakers (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Meaning maps capture the density of local semantic features in scenes: A reply to Pedziwiatr, Kümmerer, Wallis, Bethge & Teufel (2021).John M. Henderson, Taylor R. Hayes, Candace E. Peacock & Gwendolyn Rehrig - 2021 - Cognition 214 (C):104742.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations