Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Metodología para el análisis de casos clínicos en los comités de bioética. Enfoques y propuesta de apoyo.Pedro José Sarmiento, María de los Ángeles Mazzanti, Elena Rey & Pablo Arango - 2016 - Persona y Bioética 20 (1):10-25.
    This paper examines and evaluates the models and the most important methods for solving clinical cases; namely, 1) principlism, 2) deontologism, 3) consequentialism, 4) casuistry, 5) virtue ethics and 6) ethics centered on the person. The strengths and weaknesses of each are weighed and an instrument is proposed to facilitate this type of analysis. As a group, the preference is for a methodology that articulates three models: the virtue approach, the person-centered approach, and these two in harmony with an ethics (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The quarantine of philosophy in medical education: Why teaching the humanities may not produce humane physicians.William E. Stempsey - 1999 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (1):3-9.
    Patients increasingly see physicians not as humane caregivers but as unfeeling technicians. The study of philosophy in medical school has been proposed to foster critical thinking about one's assumptions, perspectives and biases, encourage greater tolerance toward the ideas of others, and cultivate empathy. I suggest that the study of ethics and philosophy by medical students has failed to produce the humane physicians we seek because of the way the subject matter is quarantined in American medical education. First, the liberal arts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations