Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. iMinerva: A Mathematical Model of Distributional Statistical Learning.Erik D. Thiessen & Philip I. Pavlik - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (2):310-343.
    Statistical learning refers to the ability to identify structure in the input based on its statistical properties. For many linguistic structures, the relevant statistical features are distributional: They are related to the frequency and variability of exemplars in the input. These distributional regularities have been suggested to play a role in many different aspects of language learning, including phonetic categories, using phonemic distinctions in word learning, and discovering non-adjacent relations. On the surface, these different aspects share few commonalities. Despite this, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Pre-linguistic segmentation of speech into syllable-like units.Okko Räsänen, Gabriel Doyle & Michael C. Frank - 2018 - Cognition 171 (C):130-150.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • What Mechanisms Underlie Implicit Statistical Learning? Transitional Probabilities Versus Chunks in Language Learning.Pierre Perruchet - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (3):520-535.
    In 2006, Perruchet and Pacton (2006) asked whether implicit learning and statistical learning represent two approaches to the same phenomenon. This article represents an important follow‐up to their seminal review article. As in the previous paper, the focus is on the formation of elementary cognitive units. Both approaches favor different explanations on what these units consist of and how they are formed. Perruchet weighs up the evidence for different explanations and concludes with a helpful agenda for future research.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • How Many Mechanisms Are Needed to Analyze Speech? A Connectionist Simulation of Structural Rule Learning in Artificial Language Acquisition.Aarre Laakso & Paco Calvo - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (7):1243-1281.
    Some empirical evidence in the artificial language acquisition literature has been taken to suggest that statistical learning mechanisms are insufficient for extracting structural information from an artificial language. According to the more than one mechanism (MOM) hypothesis, at least two mechanisms are required in order to acquire language from speech: (a) a statistical mechanism for speech segmentation; and (b) an additional rule-following mechanism in order to induce grammatical regularities. In this article, we present a set of neural network studies demonstrating (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Zipfian frequency distributions facilitate word segmentation in context.Chigusa Kurumada, Stephan C. Meylan & Michael C. Frank - 2013 - Cognition 127 (3):439-453.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations