Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)An “Enchanted” or a “Fragmented” Social World? Recognition and Domination in Honneth and Bourdieu.Louis Carré - 2021 - Critical Horizons 22 (1):89-109.
    Current debates on recognition and domination tend to be characterized by two polarized positions. Where the “anti-recognition” camp views recognition as a tool for establishing and reproducing relations of power, the “pro-recognition” camp conceives it as a way for dominated individuals and social groups to lay stake to intersubjective relations that are more just. At first glance, Honneth’s normative theory of recognition and Bourdieu’s critical sociology of domination also divide along these lines. Honneth takes the pro-recognition stance, criticizing the French (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)An “Enchanted” or a “Fragmented” Social World? Recognition and Domination in Honneth and Bourdieu.Louis Carré - 2019 - Critical Horizons:1-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Explanation, understanding and determinism in Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology.Gabriel Peters - 2014 - History of the Human Sciences 27 (1):124-149.
    This article locates Bourdieu’s sociology within the lasting controversy concerning the nature of causal explanation and interpretative understanding in the social sciences, with a special focus on the classical problem surrounding the alleged compatibility between these procedures. First, it is argued that Bourdieu’s praxeological and relational perspective on the social universe leads him not only to join the ‘compatibility field’ of the debate, but to sustain, more radically, the identity between explanation and understanding. Second, the article defends the view that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Revisiting Fromm and Bourdieu: Contributions to habitus and realism.Carmen M. Grillo - 2018 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48 (4):416-432.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bourdieu’s philosophical anthropologies: Exploring and Marxifying his framework for academic field research.Lew Zipin - forthcoming - Educational Philosophy and Theory.
    Philosophical anthropologies (PAs) – ontological assumptions about human species-nature – have long faced Foucauldian post-structural rejection of their value and legitimacy in explaining sociological problematics. In this article I endorse Bourdieu’s resistance to a post-PA momentum, arguing that PAs need assuming in sociological research. In the process, I explore PAs within Bourdieu’s research framework, including how his key empirical-analytic concepts – ‘habitus’, ‘field’, ‘illusio’ and ‘forms of capital’ – echo the PAs he assumes. Yet I argue his conceptual framework would (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark