Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. An Epistemic Argument for Tolerance.René van Woudenberg - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (5):428-435.
    In this paper I first take a critical look at Grube’s allegiance to the idea that bivalence should be rejected as it can serve the cause of religious toleration. I argue that bivalence is not what Grube says it is, and that rejection of bivalence comes at a very high price that we should not be willing to pay. Next I analyze Grube’s argument for religious toleration – an argument that does not involve the rejection of bivalence. I argue that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Science and the Ethics of Belief. An Examination of Philipse’s ‘Rule R’.René van Woudenberg & Joelle Rothuizen-van der Steen - 2016 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 47 (2):349-362.
    It has recently been argued that the following Rule should be part of any characterization of science: Claims concerning specific disputed facts should be endorsed only if they are sufficiently supported by the application of validated methods of research or discovery, and moreover that acceptance of this Rule should lead one to reject religious belief. This paper argues, first, that the Rule, as stated, should not be accepted as it suffers from a number of problems. And second, that even if (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Both Random and Guided.R. van Woudenberg & J. Rothuizen-van der Steen - 2015 - Ratio 28 (3):332-348.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Both Random and Guided.R. Woudenberg & J. Rothuizen‐van der Steen - 2015 - Ratio 28 (3):332-348.
    This paper argues, first, that biological evolution can be both random and divinely guided at the same time. Next it discusses the idea that the claim that evolution is unguided is not part of the science of evolution, and defends it against a number of objections.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations