Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Maximizing the Value of Electronic Prescription Monitoring Programs.David B. Brushwood - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):41-54.
    There is general agreement that the “principle of balance” should guide controlled substance policy and regulation in the United States. Although the diversion of controlled substances from medical to nonmedical purposes is a significant public health problem, overly aggressive controlled substance regulation has been shown to have an unintended deterrent effect on appropriate controlled substance use, including pain management with opioid analgesics. The promotion of effective pain management and the reduction of substance abuse are equally important regulatory objectives. Neither regulatory (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Challenges in the Federal Regulation of Pain Management Technologies.Lars Noah - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):55-74.
    Those who write about pain management have focused almost entirely on delivery issues, paying essentially no attention to the federal regulatory challenges that affect the development of pain relief technologies — namely, pharmaceuticals and medical devices indicated for analgesic uses. The academic literature is strangely devoid of any sophisticated discussion of the difficulties that attend, first, the product approval decisions of the Food and Drug Administration and, second, the scheduling decisions made by the Drug Enforcement Administration. If a “bottleneck” develops (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Providing Relief to Those in Pain: A Retrospective on the Scholarship and Impact of the Mayday Project.Sandra H. Johnson - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (1):15-20.
    Scholarship has intrinsic value, of course; but when good scholarship can stimulate change for the better in an area as fundamental to human dignity as health care and the relief of suffering, there is a special satisfaction. This has been our experience since 1996, when the first of now four special issues of this journal focused on legal, regulatory, ethical, professional, and financial issues in medical treatment for pain.With the generous and steadfast support of the Mayday Fund, the American Society (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations