Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Husserl’s transcendental philosophy and the critique of naturalism.Dermot Moran - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):401-425.
    Throughout his career, Husserl identifies naturalism as the greatest threat to both the sciences and philosophy. In this paper, I explicate Husserl’s overall diagnosis and critique of naturalism and then examine the specific transcendental aspect of his critique. Husserl agreed with the Neo-Kantians in rejecting naturalism. He has three major critiques of naturalism: First, it (like psychologism and for the same reasons) is ‘countersensical’ in that it denies the very ideal laws that it needs for its own justification. Second, naturalism (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Natorp Saw and Burnyeat Missed.Sylvain Delcomminette - forthcoming - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.
    In his paper “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Berkeley Missed and Descartes Saw,” Myles Burnyeat purports to show not only that idealism was not endorsed by any ancient philosopher, but also that it could not have been endorsed before Descartes; Greek philosophy was dominated by an “unquestioned, unquestioning assumption of realism.” By ‘idealism,’ Burnyeat means mainly Berkeley’s immaterialism, but he also extends his demonstration to something more akin to Kant’s transcendental idealism. After arguing that this last version has more historical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Editorial introduction.Damian Veal - 2005 - Angelaki 10 (1):1 – 31.
    The project behind this and the following1 special issue of Angelaki first assumed concrete form in the shape of a three-day international conference, “Continental Philosophy and the Sciences,” hel...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • La lecture aristotélicienne de Platon selon Paul Natorp.Sylvain Delcomminette - 2023 - Philosophie Antique 23:191-215.
    Dans les deux derniers chapitres de Platos Ideenlehre, Paul Natorp confronte son interprétation de la théorie des Idées platoniciennes à celle d’Aristote, qu’il considère comme l’origine des déformations historiques dont celle-ci aurait été la victime. Selon lui, ces déformations s’ancrent dans le profond dogmatisme de la pensée aristotélicienne, incapable d’accéder au point de vue criticiste de Platon. Le débat entre Platon et Aristote fournit dès lors l’occasion à Natorp de préciser la signification de l’opposition entre le criticisme et le dogmatisme (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark