Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Karl Polanyi: a theorist of mixed economies.Iván Szelényi & Péter Mihályi - 2021 - Theory and Society 50 (3):443-461.
    Karl Polanyi’s scholarship is interpreted in radically different ways. The “hard” reading of Polanyi sees him as a radical socialist; the “soft” reading presents him as a theorist of mixed economy. This article sides with the soft interpretation. It uses Polanyi’s biography to explain his theoretical “elusiveness,” presents a novel interpretation of his three types of economic integration, claiming all economies are “mixed.” While it acknowledges Polanyi as one of the major sources of world system theory, it claims that Polanyi (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Who is right about the modern economy: Polanyi, Zelizer, or both? [REVIEW]Philippe Steiner - 2009 - Theory and Society 38 (1):97-110.
    Zelizer’s work may be read as an attack on the central Polanyian thesis: that the market system threatens social life by the undue prominence it lends the economy in the organization of modern society. The recent publication of Viviana Zelizer’s The Purchase of Intimacy (2005a) is therefore an excellent opportunity to review the general trend of her work Zelizer 1979, 1985, 1994, and contrast her leading ideas to the central thesis that gives Polanyi’s work its particular flavor: the danger encapsulated (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The reproving of Karl Polanyi.Santhi Hejeebu & Deirdre McCloskey - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (3-4):285-314.
    Karl Polanyi's The Great Transformation has had enormous influence since its publication in 1944. In form, this influence has been salutary: Polanyi targets one of the main weaknesses of modern economics. But in substance, Polanyi's influence has been baneful. Mirroring the methodological blindness he criticizes, Polanyi insists on the all‐or‐nothing existence/ nonexistence of laissez faire—and on its all‐or‐nothing goodness/badness.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • After ideocracy and civil society.Chris Hann - 2015 - Thesis Eleven 128 (1):41-55.
    Behind only that of Bronislaw Malinowski, the influence of the Central European polymaths Ernest Gellner and Karl Polanyi on socio-cultural anthropology in the 20th century was profound. Gellner and Polanyi also influenced much wider swathes of scholarship. They belong to different generations and were raised in quite different settings in Prague and Budapest respectively. What these thinkers have in common is a philosophy of history which posits the industrial revolution in northwest Europe as a radical rupture in Weltgeschichte. Polanyi’s ‘great (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation