Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Phylogeny of Rationality

Cognitive Science 17 (4):563-588 (1993)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Deciding, Planning, and Practical Reasoning: Elements towards a Cognitive Architecture.L. A. Perez-Miranda - 1997 - Argumentation 11 (4):435-461.
    I intend to show some of the limits of the decision-theoretic model in connection with the analysis of cognitive agency. Although the concept of maximum expected utility can be helpful for explaining the decision-making process, it is certainly not the primary motor that moves agents to action. Moreover, it has been noticed elsewhere that this model is inadequate to the analysis of single cases of practical reasoning. A theory is proposed that introduces a plan-structure as a basic idea. In order (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Should reason be fragmented?Nenad Miščević - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):23-36.
    Cognitive relativists‐pragmatists (Stich, Churchland) claim that human cognitive strategies, lacking a common goal, are in addition divergent to the point of incommensurability. They appeal to the study of reasoning heuristics for evidence on cognitive diversity and incorrigibility. It is here argued that no such evidence is offered by the research, which, on the contrary (1) presents heuristics as uniform across great variations; (2) offers advice for correcting and improving human reasoning; and (3) very often postulates a uniformity of core logical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Biological Agency: Its Subjective Foundations and a Large-Scale Taxonomy.Adelina Brizio & Maurizio Tirassa - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • AI and the tyranny of Galen, or why evolutionary psychology and cognitive ethology are important to artificial intelligence.Eric Dietrich - 1994 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 6 (4):325-330.
    Concern over the nature of AI is, for the tastes many AI scientists, probably overdone. In this they are like all other scientists. Working scientists worry about experiments, data, and theories, not foundational issues such as what their work is really about or whether their discipline is methodologically healthy. However, most scientists aren’t in a field that is approximately fifty years old. Even relatively new fields such as nonlinear dynamics or branches of biochemistry are in fact advances in older established (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark