Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. No Country for Old Laws: Why the Effort to Revise the UDDA Reveals the Social Weakness of Medicine in the US.Adam Omelianchuk - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):108-110.
    Arian Lewis provides a comprehensive overview of how the United Kingdom’s medicolegal context manages challenges to determining death by neurologic criteria (DNC) and suggests that a well-crafted s...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Courts, rights and the critically brain-injured patient.Barry Lyons & Mary Donnelly - 2024 - Journal of Medical Ethics 50 (7):496-497.
    The reality of current clinical practice in the UK is that where a patient’s family refuses to agree to testing for brain stem death (BD), such cases will ultimately end up in court. This situation is true of both adults and children and reinforced by recent legal cases. While recourse to the courts might be regrettable in such tragic cases, if public trust in the medical diagnosis of BD is to be maintained all aspects of the process must be conducted (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Parents Have a Right to Refuse Brain Death Testing, Including Apnea Testing.Alexander A. Kon - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):106-108.
    In the United States, patients have a clear right to determine what is done to them by doctors. Starting in the early 20th century, multiple court cases paved the way for our current understanding...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation