Switch to: References

Citations of:

Immateriality and Separation in Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas

In Dag Nikolaus Hasse & Amos Bertolacci (eds.), The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna's "Metaphysics". De Gruyter. pp. 275-308 (2011)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Necessary Existence and the Doctrine of Being in Avicenna's Metaphysics of the Healing: On the Function of the Fundamental Scientific First Principles of Metaphysics.Daniel De Haan - 2014 - Dissertation, Ku Leuven
    This thesis is concerned with answering the question, what is the central argument of Avicenna’s Metaphysics of the Healing that brings its opening ontological approach to the subject of first philosophy to its ultimate theological goal and conclusion? This dissertation contends that it is the function of the fundamental scientific first principles of metaphysics, and in particular the fundamental primary notion necessary, to provide the intelligible link that Avicenna employs to demonstrate the existence and true-nature of the divine necessary existence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī and Ibrāhīm ibn ʿAdī: On whether body is a substance or a quantity. Introduction, editio princeps and translation.Stephen Menn & Robert Wisnovsky - 2017 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 27 (1):1-74.
    The “lost” Yaḥyā ibn ʿAdī treatises recently discovered in the Tehran codex Marwī 19 include a record of a philosophical debate instigated by the Ḥamdānid prince Sayf-al-Dawla. More precisely, Marwī 19 contains Yaḥyā’s adjudication of a dispute between an unnamed Opponent and Yaḥyā’s younger relative Ibrāhīm ibn ʿAdī (who also served as al-Fārābī’s assistant), along with Ibrāhīm's response to Yaḥyā’s adjudication, and Yaḥyā’s final word. At issue was a problem of Aristotelian exegesis: should “body” be understood as falling under the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Avicenna on the Nature of Mathematical Objects.Mohammad Saleh Zarepour - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (3):511-536.
    Some authors have proposed that Avicenna considers mathematical objects, i.e., geometric shapes and numbers, to be mental existents completely separated from matter. In this paper, I will show that this description, though not completely wrong, is misleading. Avicenna endorses, I will argue, some sort of literalism, potentialism, and finitism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Collection of Essays on the Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics. A Review Essay of Dag Nikolaus Hasse and Amos Bertolacci (Eds.), The Arabic, Hebrew, and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Metaphysics [Scientia Graeco-Arabica, vol. 7], Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2012, 398 pp., ISBN 978-3-11-021575-5. [REVIEW]Tzvi Langermann - 2013 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 7 (1):99-107.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark