Switch to: References

Citations of:

Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd edition

Stephen G. Post (ed.)

MacMillan Reference USA (2004)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.

The physician's role in the protection of human research subjects.Professor John R. Williams - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):5-12.details Responsibility for the protection of human research subjects is shared by investigators, research ethics committees, sponsors/funders, research institutions, governments and, the focus of this article, physicians who enrol patients in clinical trials. The article describes the general principles of the patient-physician relationship that should regulate the participation of physicians in clinical trials and proposes guidelines for determining when and how such participation should proceed. The guidelines deal with the following stages of the trial: when first considering participation, when deciding whether (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
Taking biology seriously: What biology can and cannot tell us about moral and public policy issues by Immaculada de melo-martìn.Adam Briggle - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):129-132.details Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
The physician’s role in the protection of human research subjects.John R. Williams - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):5-12.details Responsibility for the protection of human research subjects is shared by investigators, research ethics committees, sponsors/funders, research institutions, governments and, the focus of this article, physicians who enrol patients in clinical trials. The article describes the general principles of the patient-physician relationship that should regulate the participation of physicians in clinical trials and proposes guidelines for determining when and how such participation should proceed. The guidelines deal with the following stages of the trial: when first considering participation, when deciding whether (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 1 citation
Advance Directive from the Romanian Social Cultural Perspective.Silvia Dumitras, Mariana Enache, Andrada Parvu, Stefana Maria Moisa, Catalin Iov & Beatrice Ioan - 2013 - Postmodern Openings 4 (1):87-101.details Giving value to the wishes of the terminal patients regarding the treatment at the end of their life, the use of the advance directive, as an extension of their autonomy when the patients are incompetent, represents a mean to respect and promote their dignity. The authors present and discuss the results of their research that analysed the attitude of Romanians toward the use of the advance directive to identify the usefulness of implementing such a document in the Romanian social cultural (...) Download Export citation Bookmark
The Substituted Judgment Standard. Studies on the Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Linus Broström - unknowndetails Patients who are incompetent need a surrogate decision maker to make treatment decisons on their behalf. One of the main ethical questions that arise in this context is what standard ought to govern such decision making. According to the Substituted Judgment Standard, a surrogate ought to make the decision that the patient would have made, had he or she been competent. Although this standard has sometimes been criticized on the grounds of being difficult to apply, it has found wide appeal, (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 2 citations
Interdisciplinarity in ethics and the ethics of interdisciplinarity.Anne Balsamo & Carl Mitcham - 2010 - In Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein & Carl Mitcham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 259.details Download Export citation Bookmark 3 citations

1