Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Formalism in Austrian‐school welfare economics: Another pretense of knowledge?David L. Prychitko - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (4):567-592.
    Contemporary Austrian‐school economists reject neoclassical welfare theory for being founded on the benchmark of a perfectly competitive general equilibrium, and instead favor a formal theory deemed consistent with the notions of radical subjectivism and disequilibrium analysis. Roy Cordato advances a bold free‐market benchmark by which to formally assess social welfare, economic efficiency, and externalities issues. Like all formalist, a priori theory, however, Cordato's reformulation cannot meet its own standards, being theoretically and empirically flawed, and perhaps ideologically suspect.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Letters.David L. Prychitko, Tibor R. Machan, Mordecai Schwartz & Gus Dizerega - 1988 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 2 (2-3):220-240.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Marx, postmodernism, and self‐management: Reply to Abell.David L. Prychitko - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (2):301-310.
    Peter Abell's review of Marxism and Workers’ Self‐Management misses the mark. Contrary to Abell's assertions, my book neither champions a postmodern case for self‐management, nor does it try to salvage a socialist case for self‐management by focusing on Marx's humanism. Self‐managed firms require markets. It may be interesting to ask if that saves Marx, or if that also requires postmodernity, but these were not the concerns or arguments of the book.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Individuals and institutions.Peter J. Boettke - 1990 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 4 (1-2):10-26.
    ECONOMICS AND INSTITUTIONS: A MANIFESTO FOR MODERN INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS by Geoffrey Hodgson Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988. 365pp., $39.95 Traditional institutional economics argued that the methodological individualism of both classical and neoclassical economics was grounded in a false conception of human nature and a pre?scientific understanding of economic life. Geoffrey Hodgson has provided a restatement of this position and extended the institutionalist critique to modern developments within economics at both a positive and normative level. In the course of doing (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation