Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Split brains and atomic persons.James Moor - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (March):91-106.
    Many have claimed that split-brain patients are actually two persons. I maintain that both the traditional separation argument and the more recent sophistication argument for the two persons interpretation are inadequate on conceptual grounds. An autonomy argument is inadequate on empirical grounds. Overall, theoretical and practical consequences weigh heavily in favor of adopting a one person interpretation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (1 other version)On Puccetti’s Two-Persons View of Man.Charles L. Y. Cheng - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):605-616.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Puccetti and brain bisection: An attempt at mental division.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (September):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)On Puccetti's Two‐Persons View of Man.Charles L. Y. Cheng - 1978 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):605-616.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Puccetti and Brain Bisection.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation