Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. (1 other version)Puccetti and Brain Bisection.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Henry Holland on the hypothesis of duality of mind.Lauren Julius Harris - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):732.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mental duality, unity and multiplicity, and a holographic model of the mind.John L. Bradshaw - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):732.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Holograms, history, mental agnosticism, and testability.Roland Puccetti - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):735.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The lack of a case for mental duality.Georges Rey - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):733.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A proposed experimental test of Puccetti's dual consciousness hypothesis.David L. Wilson - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):735.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)Puccetti and brain bisection: An attempt at mental division.Roger J. Rigterink - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (September):429-452.
    Science is full of surprises. Fortunately, most of these surprises are small. A scientist, for example, might make an unexpected discoverey, but the discovery simply adds new data in support of an old theory. Or perhaps the discovery will endanger an existing theory, but one which has only local import. In cases like these, the existing theory will be modified, or perhaps even rejected; but the research tradition which surrounds the local theory will remain, by and large, unaffected and will (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • On Behalf of the Materialist.Glenn Pearce - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):163 - 168.
    Suppose we are able to transplant Jones's pain centres into Smith's brain. Half way through the operation we test the pain centres by stimulating them electrically in vitro. Would there be pain? Roland Puccetti argues that there would not be. Because pains must have owners and the only available candidate for that role — the excised tissue — is logically unfit to play it. He concludes that the firing of such centres in a normally functioning brain cannot be pain either (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations