Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Predicate order and coherence in copredication.Elliot Murphy - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (6):1744-1780.
    This article proposes that predicate order and coherence relations are the two major determining factors in copredication licensing, resolving a long-standing puzzle over the criteria for constructing acceptable copredications. The effects of predicate ordering are claimed to be anchored around semantic complexity, such that copredications with semantically Simple–Complex predicate orderings are more acceptable than the reverse. This motivates a parsing bias, termed Incremental Semantic Complexity. Particular ways of implementing this parsing bias are discussed. The effect of predicate coherence is claimed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Referring to institutional entities: Semantic and ontological perspectives.Alexandra Arapinis - 2013 - Applied ontology 8 (1):31-57.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Order independent and persistent typed default unification.Alex Lascarides, Ted Briscoe, Nicholas Asher & Ann Copestake - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (1):1 - 90.
    We define an order independent version of default unification on typed feature structures. The operation is one where default information in a feature structure typed with a more specific type, will override default information in a feature structure typed with a more general type, where specificity is defined by the subtyping relation in the type hierarchy. The operation is also able to handle feature structures where reentrancies are default. We provide a formal semantics, prove order independence and demonstrate the utility (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Dynamic Context Generation for Natural Language Understanding: A Multifaceted Knowledge Approach.Samuel W. K. Chan - unknown
    ��We describe a comprehensive framework for text un- derstanding, based on the representation of context. It is designed to serve as a representation of semantics for the full range of in- terpretive and inferential needs of general natural language pro- cessing. Its most distinctive feature is its uniform representation of the various simple and independent linguistic sources that play a role in determining meaning: lexical associations, syntactic re- strictions, case-role expectations, and most importantly, contextual effects. Compositional syntactic structure from a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Understanding metonymies in discourse.Katja Markert & Udo Hahn - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence 135 (1-2):145-198.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations