Switch to: References

Citations of:

Comments on Chomsky's and Fodor's replies

In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press (1980)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The poverty of the stimulus argument.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):217-276.
    Noam Chomsky's Poverty of the Stimulus Argument is one of the most famous and controversial arguments in the study of language and the mind. Though widely endorsed by linguists, the argument has met with much resistance in philosophy. Unfortunately, philosophical critics have often failed to fully appreciate the power of the argument. In this paper, we provide a systematic presentation of the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument, clarifying its structure, content, and evidential base. We defend the argument against a variety (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • Futures for philosophy of education.Michael A. Peters - 2008 - Analysis and Metaphysics 7:14-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Chomsky on the 'ordinary language' view of language.Francis Y. Lin - 1999 - Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
    There is a common-sense view of language, which is held by Wittgenstein, Strawson Dummett, Searle, Putnam, Lewis, Wiggins, and others. According to this view a language consists of conventions, it is rule-governed, rules are conventionalised, a language is learnt, there are general learning mechanisms in the brain, and so on. I shall call this view the ‘ ordinary language ’ view of language. Chomsky’s attitude towards this view of language has been rather negative, and his rejection of it is a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark