Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Thing-ing and No-Thing in Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi.Qingjie James Wang - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (2):159-174.
    “Thing” and “nothing” are metaphysical themes of thinking for major philosophers both in the West and in East Asia, such as Heidegger, Kant, and Laozi 老子. In light of a discussion of Heidegger’s understanding of thing-ing and no-thing and of his critical interpretation of Kant on the same issue, I shall in this essay reconstruct a Laozian theory of thing and nothing. My conclusion is that thing and nothing are not two “things,” as often assumed by an epistemological approach, but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Heng and temporality of Dao: Laozi and Heidegger. [REVIEW]Qingjie Wang - 2001 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):55-71.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Laozi’s criticism of government and society and a daoist criticism of the modern state.Aleksandar Stamatov - 2017 - Asian Philosophy 27 (2):127-149.
    The Laozi expounds a thoroughgoing and sustained criticism of government and society. In this paper, I will demonstrate that although this criticism is addressed to the ancient Chinese state, it can also have some validity for the modern state of today. I will first briefly discuss the metaphysical grounds of this criticism and stress that the ruler should use wuwei in governing. Then, I will examine the Laozi’s criticism of the oppressive governments that use unnatural governing through youwei which increases (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations