Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Expanding the use of posthumous assisted reproduction technique: Should the deceased’s parents be allowed to use his sperm?Efrat Ram-Tiktin, Roy Gilbar, Ronit B. Fruchter, Ido Ben-Ami, Shevach Friedler & Einat Shalom-Paz - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 14 (1):18-25.
    The posthumous retrieval and use of gametes is socially, ethically, and legally controversial. In the countries that do not prohibit the practice, posthumous assisted reproduction is usually permitted only at the request of the surviving spouse and only when the deceased left written consent. This paper presents the recommendations of an ethics committee established by the Israeli Fertility Association. In its discussions, the committee addressed the ethical considerations of posthumous use of sperm—even in the absence of written consent from the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Parent-initiated posthumous-assisted reproduction revisited in light of the interest in genetic origins.Ya'arit Bokek-Cohen & Vardit Ravitsky - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (5):357-360.
    A rich literature in bioethics argues against the use of anonymous gamete donation in the name of the ‘interest in knowing one’s genetic origins’. This interest stems from medical as well as psychosocial and identity reasons. The term ‘genealogical bewilderment’ has been coined to express the predicament of those deprived of access to information about their origins. Another rich body of literature in bioethics discusses arguments for and against posthumous-assisted reproduction (PAR), with a recent focus on PAR that is initiated (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark