Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Les « éléments » (esṭuksē / ītyē) dans le système cosmogonique de Bardesane.Izabela Jurasz - 2021 - Philosophie Antique 21:147-175.
    Comme l’attestent les textes relatifs à la cosmologie de Bardesane, le monde est venu à l’existence à partir des esṭuksē / ītyē, qui correspondraient aux éléments primordiaux de la tradition philosophique grecque. Bien que la cosmologie de Bardesane soit déjà étudiée, les témoignages au sujet des esṭuksē / ītyē contiennent des contradictions difficiles à expliquer. Le présent article propose une nouvelle interprétation de la doctrine de Bardesane, fondée sur la comparaison avec la cosmologie d’Aristote. L’approche aristotélicienne du mouvement des éléments, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Not-Being, Contradiction and Difference. Simplicius vs. Alexander of Aphrodisias on Plato’s Conception of Not-Being.Roberto Granieri - 2023 - Méthexis 35 (1):185-200.
    In explicating a passage from Physics A 3, Simplicius reports a criticism by Alexander of Aphrodisias against Plato’s conception of not-being in the Sophist. Alexander deems this conception contradictory, because it posits that unqualified not-being is. Simplicius defends Plato and gives a diagnosis of what he regards as Alexander’s interpretative mistake in raising his objection. I unpack this debate and bring out ways in which it sheds light on important aspects of Plato’s project in the Sophist and of Simplicius’ own (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Seneca’s Heraclitus DK 22 B 49a and Parmenides.Leonardo Franchi - 2024 - Peitho 15 (1):341-362.
    Several scholarly inquiries have explored the possibility that Parmenides was acquainted with Heraclitus and engaged in polemics against him, in light of the fact that their respective chronologies do not preclude this scenario. However, with few exceptions, the debate remains polarized between two main positions: the first contends that Heraclitus and Parmenides were likely unaware of each other, or at least that no conclusive evidence exists to prove their acquaintance; the second posits that Parmenides was indeed aware of Heraclitus and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark