Switch to: References

Citations of:

It is her problem, not ours" : Contributions of feminist bioethics to the mainstream

In Jackie Leach Scully, Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven & Petya Fitzpatrick (eds.), Feminist bioethics: at the center, on the margins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (2010)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Scientific Reforms, Feminist Interventions, and the Politics of Knowing: An Auto‐ethnography of a Feminist Neuroscientist.Sara Giordano - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (4):755-773.
    Feminist science studies scholars have documented the historical and cultural contingency of scientific knowledge production. It follows that political and social activism has impacted the practice of science today; however, little has been done to examine the current cultures of science in light of feminist critiques and activism. In this article, I argue that, although critiques have changed the cultures of science both directly and indirectly, fundamental epistemological questions have largely been ignored and neutralized through these policy reforms. I provide (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • To What Extent Does or Should a Woman's Autonomy Overrule the Interests of Her Baby? A Study of Autonomy-related Issues in the Context of Caesarean Section.Rebecca Brione - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):71-86.
    Approaches to supporting autonomy in medicine need to be able to support complex and sensitive decision-making, incorporating reflection on the patient's values and goals. This should involve deliberation in partnership between physician and patient, allowing the patient to take responsibility for her decision. Nowhere is this truer than in decisions around pregnancy and Caesarean section where maternal autonomy can seem to directly conflict with foetal interests. Medical and societal expectations and norms such as the expectations of a ‘mother’, constraints of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): is routinization problematic?Aviad Raz, Daniëlle R. M. Timmermans & Christoph Rehmann-Sutter - 2023 - BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundThe introduction and wide application of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has triggered further evolution of routines in the practice of prenatal diagnosis. ‘Routinization’ of prenatal diagnosis however has been associated with hampered informed choice and eugenic attitudes or outcomes. It is viewed, at least in some countries, with great suspicion in both bioethics and public discourse. However, it is a heterogeneous phenomenon that needs to be scrutinized in the wider context of social practices of reproductive genetics. In different countries with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark