Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Do Research Intermediaries Reduce Perceived Coercion to Enter Research Trials Among Criminally Involved Substance Abusers?David S. Festinger, Karen L. Dugosh, Jason R. Croft, Patricia L. Arabia & Douglas B. Marlowe - 2011 - Ethics and Behavior 21 (3):252 - 259.
    We examined the efficacy of including a research intermediary (RI) during the consent process in reducing participants' perceptions of coercion to enroll in a research study. Eighty-four drug court clients being recruited into an ongoing study were randomized to receive a standard informed consent process alone (standard condition) or with an RI (intermediary condition). Before obtaining consent, RIs met with clients individually to discuss remaining concerns. Findings provided preliminary evidence that RIs reduced client perceptions that their participation might influence how (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Innovation in Human Research Protection: The AbioCor Artificial Heart Trial.E. Haavi Morreim, George E. Webb, Harvey L. Gordon, Baruch Brody, David Casarett, Ken Rosenfeld, James Sabin, John D. Lantos, Barry Morenz, Robert Krouse & Stan Goodman - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (5):W6-W16.
    Human clinical research has become a huge economic enterprise (Morin et al. 2002; Noah 2002). Because the human subject at the center can be so easily marginalized, many commentators recommend spec...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The ombudsman for research practice.Ruth L. Fischbach & Diane C. Gilbert - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):389-402.
    We propose that institutions consider establishing a position of “Ombudsman for Research Practice”. This person would assume several roles: as asounding board to those needing confidential consultation about research issues — basic, applied or clinical; as afacilitator for those wishing to pursue a formal grievance process; and as aneducator to distribute guidelines and standards, to raise the consciousness regarding sloppy or irregular practices in order to prevent misconduct and to promote the responsible conduct of research. While there are compelling features (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Obtaining Informed Consent for Research: A Model for Use with Participants Who are Mentally Ill.Norman G. Poythress - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):367-374.
    An issue of ongoing concern to clinical investigators, medical ethicists, and institutional review board members is the problem of obtaining informed consent in research that involves people with mental illness as research participants. Although the presence of a mental disorder per se does not render a person incapable of giving informed consent, some individuals afflicted with significant cognitive impairment, formal thought disorder, substantial anxiety or depression, or a variety of other symptoms may be impaired in their capacity to comprehend consent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Obtaining Informed Consent for Research: A Model for Use with Participants Who Are Mentally Ill.Norman G. Poythress - 2002 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 30 (3):367-374.
    An issue of ongoing concern to clinical investigators, medical ethicists, and institutional review board members is the problem of obtaining informed consent in research that involves people with mental illness as research participants. Although the presence of a mental disorder per se does not render a person incapable of giving informed consent, some individuals afflicted with significant cognitive impairment, formal thought disorder, substantial anxiety or depression, or a variety of other symptoms may be impaired in their capacity to comprehend consent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The ombudsman for research practice.Dr Ruth L. Fischbach & Diane C. Gilbert - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):389-402.
    We propose that institutions consider establishing a position of “Ombudsman for Research Practice”. This person would assume several roles: as asounding board to those needing confidential consultation about research issues — basic, applied or clinical; as afacilitator for those wishing to pursue a formal grievance process; and as aneducator to distribute guidelines and standards, to raise the consciousness regarding sloppy or irregular practices in order to prevent misconduct and to promote the responsible conduct of research. While there are compelling features (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations