- Pinto's Argument, Inferences and Dialectic.Mark Weinstein - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (2).details
|
|
Analyzing Conversational Reasoning.Merrilee H. Salmon & Colleen M. Zeitz - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (1).details
|
|
Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.details
|
|
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):25-75.details
|
|
Giving Science a Bad Name: Politically and Commercially Motivated Fallacies in BSE Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):123-143.details
|
|
Argument and Medicine: A model of reasoning for clinical practice.Kara Gilbert & Gordon Whyte - unknowndetails
|
|
Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic.Jan A. van Laar - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):344-366.details
|
|
James B. Freeman,dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments. A theory of argument structure.Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):319-321.details
|
|
On the structure of dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences.Ian I. Mitroff & Richard O. Mason - 1982 - Theory and Decision 14 (4):331-350.details
|
|
Beyond contradiction and consistency: A design for a dialectical policy system.Ian I. Mitroff, Harold Quinton & Richard O. Mason - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (2):107-120.details
|
|
Consider the source: One step in assessing premise acceptability. [REVIEW]James B. Freeman - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):453-460.details
|
|
Ideals of rationality in dialogic.John Woods - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):395-408.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Parmenides as Secret Hero. Gregor Betz’s Theorie Dialektischer Strukturen : Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main, 2010, 292 pp, ISBN: 978-3-465-03629-6, EUR 49.00.Frank Zenker - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):513-525.details
|
|
The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.details
|
|
Individual Differences in the Interpretation of Commitment in Argumentation.Robert B. Ricco & Anthony Nelson Sierra - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):37-61.details
|
|
Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention.Douglas Walton - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (1):2011.details
|
|
The Three Faces of Defeasibility in the Law.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (1):118-139.details
|
|
A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.details
|
|
Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy. [REVIEW]William Rehg, Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons - 2005 - AI and Society 19 (3):203-228.details
|
|
Global justice and the logic of the burden of proof.Juha Räikkä - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1-2):228-239.details
|
|
Cognitive values, theory choice, and pluralism : on the grounds and implications of philosophical diversity.Guy Stanwood Axtell - unknowndetails
|
|
Ambiguity in argument.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):125-146.details
|
|
Mapping the Structure of Debate.Jeff Yoshimi - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Encyclopedias and the integration of knowledge.Paul T. Durbin - 1996 - Social Epistemology 10 (1):123 – 133.details
|
|
Critical Science Studies as Argumentation Theory: Who’s Afraid of SSK?William Rehg - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):33-48.details
|
|
A formal model of adjudication dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.details
|
|
The CDF collaboration and argumentation theory: The role of process in objective knowledge.William Rehg & Kent Staley - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (1):1-25.details
|
|
Eight dialectic benchmarks discussed by two artificial localist disputors.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):221 - 253.details
|
|
Concepts of "action", "structure" and "power" in "critical social realism": A positive and reconstructive critique.Heikki Patomäki - 1991 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (2):221–250.details
|
|
Argument and belief: Where we stand in the Keynesian tradition. [REVIEW]R. P. Loui - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):357-365.details
|
|
Analogy argumentation in law: A dialectical perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.details
|
|
The pleadings game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.details
|
|