- A formal model of adjudication dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.details
|
|
Analogy argumentation in law: A dialectical perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.details
|
|
The pleadings game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.details
|
|
When is argumentation deductive?Henry Prakken - 2023 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3-4):212-223.details
|
|
Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.details
|
|
Thought Experiments: State of the Art.Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown - 2017 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge. pp. 1-28.details
|
|
Dialogues in Argumentation.Von Burg Ron - 2016 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
Evaluating Dialectical Structures.Gregor Betz - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):283-312.details
|
|
Progress Without Regress on the Dialectical Tier.James B. Freeman - unknowndetails
|
|
(1 other version)Analogical Reasoning as a Tool of Epidemiological Investigation.Louise Cummings - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):427-444.details
|
|
Giving Science a Bad Name: Politically and Commercially Motivated Fallacies in BSE Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):123-143.details
|
|
Reconstructing and assessing the conditions of meaningfulness. An argumentative approach to presupposition.Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - In Henrique Jales Ribeiro (ed.), Inside Arguments: Logic And The Study of Argumentation. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishers. pp. 247--268.details
|
|
The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Presumptive Reasoning in Interpretation. Implicatures and Conflicts of Presumptions.Fabrizio Macagno - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):233-265.details
|
|
(1 other version)Mapping the Structure of Debate.Jeff Yoshimi - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games.Minghui Xiong & Frank Zenker - 2017 - Argumentation 32 (2):197-211.details
|
|
Ideals of rationality in dialogic.John Woods - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):395-408.details
|
|
Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy. [REVIEW]William Rehg, Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons - 2005 - AI and Society 19 (3):203-228.details
|
|
Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention.Douglas Walton - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (1):2011.details
|
|
Burden of proof.DouglasN Walton - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (2):233-254.details
|
|
(1 other version)Eight dialectic benchmarks discussed by two artificial localist disputors.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):221 - 253.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Burden of Criticism: Consequences of Taking a Critical Stance.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
(1 other version)The burden of criticism.Jan van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):201-224.details
|
|
Arguments that take Counterconsiderations into Account.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):240-275.details
|
|
(1 other version)Argument Schemes from the Point of View of Hamblin’s Dialectic.Jan A. van Laar - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):344-366.details
|
|
Ambiguity in argument.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):125-146.details
|
|
On argument strength.Niki Pfeifer - 2012 - In Frank Zenker (ed.), Bayesian Argumentation – The Practical Side of Probability. Springer. pp. 185-193.details
|
|
A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation.Giovanni Sartor - 1994 - Ratio Juris 7 (2):177-211.details
|
|
Beweislastverteilung und Intuitionen in philosophischen Diskursen.Thorsten Sander - 2003 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (1):69-97.details
|
|
Analyzing Conversational Reasoning.Merrilee H. Salmon & Colleen M. Zeitz - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (1).details
|
|
Distribution and ignorance.Juha Räikkä - 2019 - Synthese 198 (3):2641-2657.details
|
|
The CDF collaboration and argumentation theory: The role of process in objective knowledge.William Rehg & Kent Staley - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (1):1-25.details
|
|
Simulating Marx: Herbert A. Simon's cognitivist approach to dialectical materialism.Enrico Petracca - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (2):101-125.details
|
|
Concepts of "action", "structure" and "power" in "critical social realism": A positive and reconstructive critique.Heikki Patomäki - 1991 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (2):221–250.details
|
|
Deliberación e identidad colectiva. Usos compromisorios, directivos y expresivos de la argumentación.Hubert Marraud - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):67-95.details
|
|
Rationales and argument moves.R. P. Loui & Jeff Norman - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):159-189.details
|
|
From Berman and Hafner’s teleological context to Baude and Sachs’ interpretive defaults: an ontological challenge for the next decades of AI and Law.Ronald P. Loui - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):371-385.details
|
|
Argument and belief: Where we stand in the Keynesian tradition. [REVIEW]R. P. Loui - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (4):357-365.details
|
|
Questioning the Virtual Friendship Debate: Fuzzy Analogical Arguments from Classification and Definition.Oliver Laas - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (1):99-149.details
|
|
Motivated Doubts: A Comment on Walton's Theory of Criticism.Jan Albert van Laar - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):221-230.details
|
|
The Ways of Criticism.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):199-227.details
|
|
Global justice and the logic of the burden of proof.Juha Räikkä - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1-2):228-239.details
|
|
Making Sense of “Informal Logic”.Ralph H. Johnson - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):231-258.details
|
|
Book review. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.details
|
|
(1 other version)Johnson`s The Rise of Informal Logic: Essays on Argumentation, Critical Thinking, Reasoning and Politics.David Hitchcock - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2):269-83.details
|
|
(1 other version)Second Order Intersubjectivity: The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (1):85-105.details
|
|
(1 other version)James B. Freeman,dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments. A theory of argument structure.Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):319-321.details
|
|
The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentation.Benoı̂t Godin & Yves Gingras - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):133-148.details
|
|
Presumption as a Modal Qualifier: Presumption, Inference, and Managing Epistemic Risk.David Godden - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (3):485-511.details
|
|