Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Dosage‐dependent modification of position‐effect variegation in Drosophla.Steven Henikoff - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (5):401-409.
    Many loci in Drosophila exhibit dosage effects on single phenotypes. In the case of modifiers of position‐effect variegation, increases and decreases in dosage can have opposite effects on variegating phenotypes. This is seemingly paradoxical: if each locus encodes a limiting gene product sensitive to dosage decreases, then increasing the dosage of any one should have no effect, because the others should remain limiting. An earlier model put forward to resolve this paradox suggested that dosage‐dependent modifiers encode protein subunits of a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The vagaries of variegating transgenes.David I. K. Martin & Emma Whitelaw - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (11):919-923.
    Expression of transgenes in mice, when examined with assays that can distinguish individual cells, is often found to be heterocellular, or variegated. Line‐to‐line variations in expression of a transgene may be due largely to differences in the proportion of cells in which it is expressed. Variegated silencing by centromeric heterochromatin is well described, but other factors may also affect transgene silencing in mice. Tandem arrays of transgenes themselves form heterochromatin, and some cell lineages may tend to silence transgenes because of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The establishment of active promoters in chromatin.Peter B. Becker - 1994 - Bioessays 16 (8):541-547.
    The organization of eukaryotic genomes as chromatin provides the framework within which regulated transcription occurs in the nucleus. The association of DNA with chromatin proteins required to package the genome into the nucleus is, in general, inhibitory to transcription, and therefore provides opportunities for regulated transcriptional activation. Granting access to the cis‐acting elements in DNA, a prerequisite for any further action of the trans‐acting factors involved, requires the establishment of local heterogeneity of chromatin and, in some cases, extensive remodeling of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • White gene expression, repressive chromatin domains and homeotic gene regulation in Drosophila.Vincenzo Pirrotta & Luca Rastelli - 1994 - Bioessays 16 (8):549-556.
    The use of Drosophila chromosomal rearrangements and transposon constructs involving the white gene reveals the existence of repressive chromatin domains that can spread over considerable genomic distances. One such type of domain is found in heterochromatin and is responsible for classical position‐effect variegation. Another type of repressive domain is established, beginning at specific sequences, by complexes of Polycomb Group proteins. Such complexes, which normally regulate the expression of many genes, including the homeotic loci, are responsible for silencing, white gene variegation, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • The many colours of chromodomains.Alexander Brehm, Katharina R. Tufteland, Rein Aasland & Peter B. Becker - 2004 - Bioessays 26 (2):133-140.
    Local differences in chromatin organisation may profoundly affect the activity of eukaryotic genomes. Regulation at the level of DNA packaging requires the targeting of structural proteins and histone‐modifying enzymes to specific sites and their stable or dynamic interaction with the nucleosomal fiber. The “chromodomain”, a domain shared by many regulators of chromatin structure, has long been suspected to serve as a module mediating chromatin interactions in a variety of different protein contexts. However, recent functional analyses of a number of different (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Do protein motifs read the histone code?Xavier de la Cruz, Sergio Lois, Sara Sánchez-Molina & Marian A. Martínez-Balbás - 2005 - Bioessays 27 (2):164-175.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Chromosomal elements conferring epigenetic inheritance.Frank Lyko & Renato Paro - 1999 - Bioessays 21 (10):824-832.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Intercalary heterochromatin and genetic silencing.Igor F. Zhimulev & Elena S. Belyaeva - 2003 - Bioessays 25 (11):1040-1051.
    We focus here on the intercalary heterochromatin (IH) of Drosophila melanogaster and, in particular, its molecular properties. In the polytene chromosomes of Drosophila, IH is represented by a reproducible set of dense bands scattered along the euchromatic arms. IH contains mainly unique DNA sequences, and shares certain features with other heterochromatin types such as pericentric, telomeric, and PEV‐induced heterochromatin, the inactive mammalian X‐chromosome and the heterochromatized male chromosome set in coccids. These features are transcriptional silencing, chromatin compactness, late DNA replication, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dosage compensation in Drosophila and the 'complex' world of transcriptional regulation.John C. Lucchesi - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (7):541-547.
    The purpose of this review is to draw attention to the mechanism of dosage compensation in Drosophila as a model for the study of the regulation of gene activity through the modulation of transcription. Dosage compensation resembles some mechanisms of transcriptional regulation, found in widely divergent organisms, that do not play a role in the activation of silent genes but determine the level of activity of genes that have been induced through the action of specific activators. It differs from other (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations