Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Take Pity: What Disability Rights Can Learn from Religious Charity.Harold Braswell - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):638-652.
    Disability rights advocates have traditionally denigrated charity as politically counterproductive and inherently demeaning. This article argues that this perspective mischaracterizes charity of a religious kind. Religious charity, I argue, must be understood immanently, through an exploration of the virtues cultivated in particular religious organizations. I consider two Catholic charities: L’Arche, a community for intellectually disabled people, and the end-of-life care facility Our Lady of Perpetual Help Home. At each organization, individual acts of charity are emblematic of an underlying virtue that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Disability, Enhancement, and Flourishing.Jason T. Eberl - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (5):597-611.
    Recent debate among bioethicists concerns the potential to enhance human beings’ physical or cognitive capacities by means of genetic, pharmacological, cybernetic, or surgical interventions. Between “transhumanists,” who argue for unreserved enhancement of human capabilities, and “bioconservatives,” who warn against any non-therapeutic manipulation of humanity’s natural condition, lie those who support limited forms of enhancement for the sake of individual and collective human flourishing. Many scholars representing these views also share a concern over the status and interests of human beings with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Re‐Envisioning Independence and Community: Critiques from the Independent Living Movement and L'Arche.Lorraine Krall McCrary - 2017 - Journal of Social Philosophy 48 (3):377-393.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Disability and the Theodicy of Defeat.Aaron D. Cobb & Kevin Timpe - 2017 - Journal of Analytic Theology 5:100-120.
    Marilyn McCord Adams argues that God’s goodness to individuals requires God to defeat horrendous evils; it is not enough for God to outweigh these evils through compensatory goods. On her view, God defeats the evils experienced by an individual if and only if God’s goodness to the individual enables her to integrate the evil organically into a unified life story she perceives as good and meaningful. In this essay, we seek to apply Adams’s theodicy of defeat to a particular form (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations