Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Cognition‐Enhanced Machine Learning for Better Predictions with Limited Data.Florian Sense, Ryan Wood, Michael G. Collins, Joshua Fiechter, Aihua Wood, Michael Krusmark, Tiffany Jastrzembski & Christopher W. Myers - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (4):739-755.
    The fields of machine learning (ML) and cognitive science have developed complementary approaches to computationally modeling human behavior. ML's primary concern is maximizing prediction accuracy; cognitive science's primary concern is explaining the underlying mechanisms. Cross-talk between these disciplines is limited, likely because the tasks and goals usually differ. The domain of e-learning and knowledge acquisition constitutes a fruitful intersection for the two fields’ methodologies to be integrated because accurately tracking learning and forgetting over time and predicting future performance based on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Model‐Based Explanation of Feedback Effects in Syllogistic Reasoning.Daniel Brand, Nicolas Riesterer & Marco Ragni - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (4):828-844.
    We apply three state‐of‐the‐art models for syllogistic reasoning to data from experiments where participants received feedback for their conclusions in order to demonstrate the use of model parameters to derive new hypotheses and present possible explanations for the feedback effect.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Cognition‐Enhanced Machine Learning for Better Predictions with Limited Data.Florian Sense, Ryan Wood, Michael G. Collins, Joshua Fiechter, Aihua Wood, Michael Krusmark, Tiffany Jastrzembski & Christopher W. Myers - 2022 - Topics in Cognitive Science 14 (4):739-755.
    The fields of machine learning (ML) and cognitive science have developed complementary approaches to computationally modeling human behavior. ML's primary concern is maximizing prediction accuracy; cognitive science's primary concern is explaining the underlying mechanisms. Cross-talk between these disciplines is limited, likely because the tasks and goals usually differ. The domain of e-learning and knowledge acquisition constitutes a fruitful intersection for the two fields’ methodologies to be integrated because accurately tracking learning and forgetting over time and predicting future performance based on (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The stability of syllogistic reasoning performance over time.Hannah Dames, Karl Christoph Klauer & Marco Ragni - 2022 - Thinking and Reasoning 28 (4):529-568.
    How individuals reason deductively has concerned researchers for many years. Yet, it is still unclear whether, and if so how, participants’ reasoning performance changes over time. In two test sessions one week apart, we examined how the syllogistic reasoning performance of 100 participants changed within and between sessions. Participants’ reasoning performance increased during the first session. A week later, they started off at the same level of reasoning performance but did not further improve. The reported performance gains were only found (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations