Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent: conceptual tools.John Barugahare - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):44.
    Despite existing international, regional and national guidance on how to obtain valid consent to health-related research, valid consent remains both a practical and normative challenge. This challenge persists despite additional evidence-based guidance obtained through conceptual and empirical research in specific localities on the same subject. The purpose of this paper is to provide an account for why, despite this guidance, this challenge still persist and suggest conceptual resources that can help make sense of this problem and eventually mitigate it’. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Changing the Conversation: A Critical Bioethics Response to the Opioid Crisis.Adrian Guta, Carol J. Strike & Marilou Gagnon - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):53-54.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Aboriginal Bioethics as Critical Bioethics: The Virtue of Narrative.Shaun A. Stevenson & Stuart J. Murray - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (5):52-54.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Foundations of critical medical ethics.Giovanni Rubeis - 2024 - Ethik in der Medizin 36 (2):117-132.
    Definition of the problem Medical ethics is increasingly faced with issues that result from power asymmetries and epistemic injustice. However, medical ethics lacks the epistemic lenses for analyzing these social context factors of clinical practice. A theoretical and conceptual reconfiguration is necessary in order to be able to address these issues. Arguments This paper discusses the foundations of critical medical ethics, which takes perspectives and epistemic categories from critical theories. This includes the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School as well (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Review of Catherine Mills, Futures of Reproduction: Bioethics and Biopolitics1. [REVIEW]Silvia Camporesi - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (6):1-3.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A 14-day limit for bioethics: the debate over human embryo research.Giulia Cavaliere - 2017 - BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):38.
    BackgroundThis article explores the reasons in favour of revising and extending the current 14-day statutory limit to maintaining human embryos in culture. This limit is enshrined in law in over a dozen countries, including the United Kingdom. In two recently published studies, scientists have shown that embryos can be sustained in vitro for about 13 days after fertilisation. Positive reactions to these results have gone hand in hand with calls for revising the 14-day rule, which only allows embryo research until (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Living bioethics, theories and children’s consent to heart surgery.Priscilla Alderson, Deborah Bowman, Joe Brierley, Nathalie Dedieu, Martin J. Elliott, Jonathan Montgomery & Hugo Wellesley - forthcoming - Clinical Ethics:147775092210910.
    Background This analysis is about practical living bioethics and how law, ethics and sociology understand and respect children’s consent to, or refusal of, elective heart surgery. Analysis of underlying theories and influences will contrast legalistic bioethics with living bioethics. In-depth philosophical analysis compares social science traditions of positivism, interpretivism, critical theory and functionalism and applies them to bioethics and childhood, to examine how living bioethics may be encouraged or discouraged. Illustrative examples are drawn from research interviews and observations in two (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark