Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Searching for Islamic Economics: A Philosophical Inquiry.Syamsuddin Arif - 2023 - Journal of Critical Realism in Socio-Economics 1 (4):375–392.
    It can hardly be denied that each field of knowledge has its own subject-matter and aims, scope and limits, specific method and distinctive characteristics. Every science has its own historical background and dynamics which explain its emergence and raison d'etre, as well as influence its development over time, expanding and contracting as it were in response to the prevailing Zeitgeist and alongside societal, legal, and political changes. Consequently, each discipline inevitably reflects the realities, beliefs, needs, tendencies, and interests of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Financial Crisis in Retrospect: A Case of Misunderstood Interdependence.Juliusz Jabłecki - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (3):287-334.
    The inherent complexity of modern financial systems, and their basis in human behavior, make it hard to establish unequivocally the “who, what, where, when, and why” of the global financial crisis. However, after almost a decade, we know enough to discard much of what has, in the meantime, become folk wisdom about the causes of the debacle, including Wall Street bonus culture, bankers’ greed, the moral hazard of “too big to fail,” government intervention (“too much government”) and deregulation (“not enough (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Problem of Epistocratic Identification and the (Possibly) Dysfunctional Division of Epistemic Labor.Jeffrey Friedman - 2017 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 29 (3):293-327.
    ABSTRACTHow can political actors identify which putative expert is truly expert, given that any putative expert may be wrong about a given policy question; given that experts may therefore disagree with one another; and given that other members of the polity, being non-expert, can neither reliably adjudicate inter-expert disagreement nor detect when a consensus of experts is misguided? This would not be an important question if the problems dealt with by politics were usually simple ones, in the sense that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations