Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.Chiara Crico, Virginia Sanchini, Paolo Giovanni Casali & Gabriella Pravettoni - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (1):135-151.
    Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs), as distinct from Research Ethics Committees, were originally established with the aim of supporting healthcare professionals in managing controversial clinical ethical issues. However, it is still unclear whether they manage to accomplish this task and what is their impact on clinical practice. This systematic review aims to collect available assessments of CECs’ performance as reported in literature, in order to evaluate CECs’ effectiveness. We retrieved all literature published up to November 2019 in six databases (PubMed, Ovid (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • HEC member perspectives on the case analysis process: A qualitative multi-site study. [REVIEW]Eric Racine - 2007 - HEC Forum 19 (3):185-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Barriers and Challenges in Clinical Ethics Consultations: The Experiences of Nine Clinical Ethics Committees.Reidar Pedersen - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (8):460-469.
    Clinical ethics committees have recently been established in nearly all Norwegian hospital trusts. One important task for these committees is clinical ethics consultations. This qualitative study explores significant barriers confronting the ethics committees in providing such consultation services. The interviews with the committees indicate that there is a substantial need for clinical ethics support services and, in general, the committee members expressed a great deal of enthusiasm for the committee work. They also reported, however, that tendencies to evade moral disagreement, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations