Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Hayek's Business-Cycle Theory: Half Right.Daniel Kuehn - 2013 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 25 (3-4):497-529.
    The Great Recession has brought with it a renewed interest in Hayek's business-cycle theory, which holds that loose monetary policy generates an unsustainable boom characterized by a lengthening of the capital structure. Hayek's theory has received robust criticism for decades, although the criticisms have varied in quality. Various empirical disconfirmations pose the most serious challenge. The small empirical literature on the subject generally confirms Hayek's predictions about variations in the capital structure, but has not persuasively linked the capital structure to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Risk and Austrian business‐cycle theory: Rejoinder to Cowen.J. Barkley Rosser - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):95-97.
    abstract Cowen and I agree that rational‐expectations theory is unrealistic and that risk is difficult to quantify. However, we continue to disagree about the riskiness of consumption as opposed to investment. Since more investment might lead to a recession if investment is relatively risky, Cowen's use of rational‐expectations theory to buttress the Austrian school's claim that market economies can shift toward relatively more investment without experiencing macroeconomic disruption remains suspect.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • From Hayek to Keynes: G.L.S. shackle and ignorance of the future.Greg Hill - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (1):53-79.
    G.L.S. Shackle stood at the historic crossroads where the economics of Hayek and Keynes met. Shackle fused these opposing lines of thought in a macroeconomic theory that draws Keynesian conclusions from Austrian premises. In Shackle 's scheme of thought, the power to imagine alternative courses of action releases decision makers from the web of predictable causation. But the spontaneous and unpredictable choices that originate in the subjective and disparate orientations of individual agents deny us the possibility of rational expectations, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Risk and business cycles: Reply to Rosser.Tyler Cowen - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):89-94.
    Rosser's thoughtful and careful review of my book on business cycles reflects a different methodological stance than my own. I believe that economic theory and macroeconomics cannot escape using the concept of risk, even though, as Rosser points out, risk is not a simple unidimensional magnitude in many circumstances. I view the rational expectations assumption as a useful way of presenting a theory, rather than as a descriptive account of real‐world expectations.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations