Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Beyond "Genetic Discrimination": Toward the Broader Harm of Geneticism.Susan M. Wolf - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):345-353.
    The current explosion of genetic knowledge and the rapid proliferation of genetic tests has rightly provoked concern that we are approaching a future in which people will be labeled and disadvantaged based on genetic information. Indeed, some have already suffered harm, including denial of health insurance. This concern has prompted an outpouring of analysis. Yet almost all of it approaches the problem of genetic disadvantage under the rubric of “genetic discrimination.”This rubric is woefully inadequate to the task at hand. It (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Genetic Testing and its Implications: Human Genetics Researchers Grapple with Ethical Issues.Isaac Rabino - 2003 - Science, Technology and Human Values 28 (3):365-402.
    To better understand ethical issues involved in the field of human genetics and promote debate within the scientific community, the author surveyed scientists who engage in human genetics research about the pros, cons, and ethical implications of genetic testing. This study contributes systematic data on attitudes of scientific experts. The survey finds respondents are highly supportive of voluntary testing and the right to know one's genetic heritage. The majority consider in utero testing and consequent pregnancy termination acceptable for cases involving (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Introduction: The Genome Imperative.Thomas H. Murray & Norman T. Mendel - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):309-311.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Introduction: The Genome Imperative.Thomas H. Murray & Norman T. Mendel - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):309-311.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Genetic Privacy Laws and Patients' Fear of Discrimination by Health Insurers: The View from Genetic Counselors.Mark A. Hall & Stephen S. Rich - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):245-257.
    Since 1991, over half the states have enacted laws that restrict or prohibit insurers’ use of genetic information in pricing, issuing, or structuring health insurance. Wisconsin was the first state to do so, in 1991, followed by Ohio in 1993, California and Colorado in 1994, and then several more states a year in each of the next five years. Similar legislation has been pending in Congress for several years. Also, a 1996 federal law known as the Health Insurance Portability and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Genetic Privacy Laws and Patients' Fear of Discrimination by Health Insurers: The View from Genetic Counselors.Mark A. Hall & Stephen S. Rich - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):245-257.
    Since 1991, over half the states have enacted laws that restrict or prohibit insurers’ use of genetic information in pricing, issuing, or structuring health insurance. Wisconsin was the first state to do so, in 1991, followed by Ohio in 1993, California and Colorado in 1994, and then several more states a year in each of the next five years. Similar legislation has been pending in Congress for several years. Also, a 1996 federal law known as the Health Insurance Portability and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Genetic Privacy Act: An Analysis of Privacy and Research Concerns.Edwin S. Flores Troy - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):256-272.
    In the last few years, a great deal of attention has been paid to the effects that the achievements of the Human Genome Project will have on the confidentiality of medical information. The Genetic Privacy Act is an attempt to address the privacy, confidentiality, and property rights relating to obtaining, requesting, using, storing, and disposing of genetic material. The GPA grew out of concerns over the vast amount of genetic information that is a product of the Human Genome Project. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The Genetic Privacy Act: An Analysis of Privacy and Research Concerns.Edwin S. Flores Troy - 1997 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (4):256-272.
    In the last few years, a great deal of attention has been paid to the effects that the achievements of the Human Genome Project will have on the confidentiality of medical information. The Genetic Privacy Act is an attempt to address the privacy, confidentiality, and property rights relating to obtaining, requesting, using, storing, and disposing of genetic material. The GPA grew out of concerns over the vast amount of genetic information that is a product of the Human Genome Project. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations