Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Re-politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology.Kei Yoshida - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):365-378.
    The aim of this paper is to investigate how we can reunite social philosophy and philosophy of science to address problems in science and technology. First, referring to Don Howard?s, George Reisch?s, and Philip Mirowski?s works, I shall briefly explain how philosophy of science was depoliticised during the cold war. Second, I shall examine Steve Fuller?s criticism of Thomas Kuhn. Third, I shall scrutinise Philip Kitcher?s view of well-ordered science. Fourth, I shall emphasise the importance of autonomy and argue that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Naturalizing or demythologizing scientific inquiry: Kitcher’s: Science, truth and democracy.William A. Rottschaefer - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):408-422.
    , Philip Kitcher has argued that science ought to meet both the epistemic goals of significant truth and the nonepistemic goals of serving the interests of a democratic society. He opposes this science as servant model to both the theology of science as source of salvific truth and the theology of science as anti-Christ. In a recent critical comment, Paul A. Roth argues that Kitcher remains entangled in the theology of salvific truth, not realizing that its goal is either vacuous (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Naturalizing Or Demythologizing Scientific Inquiry: Kitcher’s: Science, Truth and Democracy.William A. Rottschaefer - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (3):408-422.
    In Science, Truth and Democracy, Philip Kitcher has argued that science ought to meet both the epistemic goals of significant truth and the nonepistemic goals of serving the interests of a democratic society. He opposes this science as servant model to both the theology of science as source of salvific truth and the theology of science as anti-Christ. In a recent critical comment, Paul A. Roth argues that Kitcher remains entangled in the theology of salvific truth, not realizing that its (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation