Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Evaluating Arguments from a Play about Ethics in Science: A Study with Medical Learners.Pablo Antonio Archila - 2017 - Argumentation 32 (1):53-76.
    Developing critical thinking ability is one of the main goals of medical education, in part because it enhances clinical reasoning, a vital competence in clinical practice. However, there is limited evidence suggesting ways to effectively teach critical thinking in the classroom. Here, we describe the use of a drama-based critical thinking classroom scenario. The study used a mixed-methods approach with both quantitative and qualitative analysis of questionnaire responses. Ninety-one medical students in Colombia were asked to identify and evaluate arguments regarding (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Strategic Manoeuvring by Dissociation in Corporate Crisis Communication: The Case of the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-Off Incident.Jieyun Feng, Fan Zhao & Aiqing Feng - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (2):321-338.
    Within the research framework of pragma-dialectics, this study analysed and assessed strategic manoeuvring by dissociation in corporate crisis communication, exemplified by the 2017 United Airlines’ Passenger Dragging-off Incident. As shown from the analysis of the public statements issued on its official website and Twitter, United Airlines adopted dissociation using the lexical item “volunteer” in the different stages of argumentation: bringing forward a standpoint, maintaining a standpoint and mitigating a standpoint. In so doing, the corporation strategically manoeuvred the topical potential and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation