Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Aesthetic surgery and the expressive body.Kathleen Lennon & Rachel Alsop - 2018 - Feminist Theory 19 (1):95-112.
    In this article, we explore the relation between bodies and selves evident in the narratives surrounding aesthetic surgery. In much feminist work on aesthetic surgery, such narratives have been discussed in terms of the normalising consequences of the objectifying, homogenising, cosmetic gaze. These discussions stress the ways in which we model our bodies, under the gaze of others, in order to conform to social norms. Such an objectified body is contrasted with the subjective body; the body-for-the-self. In this article, however, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Making Skin Visible: How Consumer Culture Imagery Commodifies Identity.Jonathan E. Schroeder & Janet L. Borgerson - 2018 - Body and Society 24 (1-2):103-136.
    Human skin, photography, and consumer culture combine to produce striking images designed to promote visions of the good life. Branding and marketing imagery mobilize skin to resonate and communicate with consumers, which influences the meaning-making possibilities of skin more broadly. Representations of skin in consumer culture, including marketing communications, are anything but ‘blank’ backgrounds or ‘neutral’ meaning spaces. We analyse how skin ‘appears’ to work, and how its appearance in consumer culture imagery reveals ideological and pedagogical aspects of skin. Building (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Gender, Ethnicity, and Transgender Embodiment: Interrogating Classification in Facial Feminization Surgery.Eric Plemons - 2019 - Body and Society 25 (1):3-28.
    Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is a set of bone and soft tissue procedures intended to feminize the faces of transgender women. In the surgical evaluation, particular facial features are identified as ‘sex specific’ and targeted for intervention as such. But those features do not exhibit ‘maleness’ or ‘femaleness’ alone; they are complexly entwined with morphologies of ethnic classification. Based on clinical observation, I show how the desired feminine ideal conflicted with facial characteristics identified as ‘ethnic’. In FFS practice, ‘masculinity’ and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark