Switch to: References

Citations of:

Longinus Revisited

Mnemosyne 34 (1-2):72-86 (1981)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Ēthos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical And Literary Criticism.Christopher Gill - 1984 - Classical Quarterly 34 (01):149-.
    Jasper Griffin, in his recent book on Homer, has suggested that modern critics would do well to pay more attention to the localized insights and the general critical framework of the ancient Greek commentators. In a previous article, ‘Homeric Pathos and Objectivity’, he claimed to show, by careful study of those passages in which the scholiasts found λεος, οκτος or πάθος, that ‘the ancient scholars were right to regard pathos as one of the most important elements in the Iliad’. also (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Longinus, On Sublimity 35.1.Malcolm Heath - 2000 - Classical Quarterly 50 (01):320-.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Dionysius and Longinus on the Sublime: Rhetoric and Religious Language.Casper C. de Jonge - 2012 - American Journal of Philology 133 (2):271-300.
    Longinus' On the Sublime presents itself as a response to the work of the Augustan critic Caecilius of Caleacte. Recent attempts to reconstruct Longinus' intellectual context have largely ignored the works of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Caecilius' contemporary colleague . This article investigates the concept of hupsos and its religious aspects in Longinus and Dionysius, and reveals a remarkable continuity between the discourse of both authors. Dionysius' works inform us about an Augustan debate on Plato and the sublime, and thereby provide (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations