Citations of:
NonArchimedean Preferences Over Countable Lotteries
Journal of Mathematical Economics 88 (May 2020):180186 (2020)
Add citations
You must login to add citations.


Should we make significant sacrifices to eversoslightly lower the chance of extremely bad outcomes, or to eversoslightly raise the chance of extremely good outcomes? *Fanaticism* says yes: for every bad outcome, there is a tiny chance of extreme disaster that is even worse, and for every good outcome, there is a tiny chance of an enormous good that is even better. I consider two related recent arguments for Fanaticism: Beckstead and Thomas's argument from *strange dependence on space and time*, and (...) 