Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Action Guidance and Educating for Intellectual Virtue: A Response to Kotzee, Carter, and Siegel.Matthew McKeon & Matthew Ferkany - forthcoming - Episteme:1-21.
    In their “Educating for Intellectual Virtue: A Critique from Action Guidance” Kotzee, Carter and Siegel (2019) argue against what they call the intellectual virtues (IV) approach to the primary epistemic aim of education and in favor of what they call the critical thinking (CT) approach. The IV approach says that educating for intellectual virtue is the primary epistemic aim of education. The CT approach says that it is educating for critical thinking. They argue that the exemplarist/role-modeling pedagogy of the IV (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Building a Pedagogical Relationship between Philosophy and Digital Humanities through a Creative Arts Paradigm.Taylor Elyse Mills - 2020 - Teaching Philosophy 43 (4):403-429.
    Though numerous disciplines are cultivating pedagogical relationships with the emerging field of digital humanities, philosophy appears to be among the least interested in what digital humanities has to offer. This is a missed opportunity. Through a proper pedagogical framing of both fields, I argue that philosophy educators would benefit from building a pedagogical relationship with digital humanities. First, I outline digital humanities methods and teaching practices, then I identify several core educational aims and teaching methods in philosophy, which I conceptualize (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark