Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi.Adam Wyner & Rinke Hoekstra - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):83-107.
    The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • TULSI: an NLP system for extracting legal modificatory provisions. [REVIEW]Leonardo Lesmo, Alessandro Mazzei, Monica Palmirani & Daniele P. Radicioni - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (2):139-172.
    In this work we present the TULSI system (so named after Turin University Legal Semantic Interpreter), a system to produce automatic annotations of normative documents through the extraction of modificatory provisions. TULSI relies on a deep syntactic analysis and a shallow semantic interpreter that are illustrated in detail. We report the results of an experimental evaluation of the system and discuss them, also suggesting future directions for further improvement.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations