Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Parity versus Ignorance.Moritz Schulz - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):1183-1204.
    Why are hard decisions hard? According to the incomparabilists, hard choices are hard because the options cannot be compared. Proponents of parity hold that hard choices are hard because the options can be compared but only in terms of a fourth value relation—parity—in addition to the three standard relations: better, worse, and equally good. Others claim that hard choices are hard because it is vague (or indeterminate) how the options relate in terms of the three standard relations. Lastly, there is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • In defense of value incomparability: A reply to Dorr, Nebel, and Zuehl.Erik Carlson & Olle Risberg - forthcoming - Noûs.
    Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call ‘Strong Monotonicity’, which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y. In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark