Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Kantian Imperative: Humiliation, Common Sense, Politics

University of Toronto Press (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is Charles Taylor (Still) a Weak Ontologist?Michiel Meijer - 2017 - Dialogue 56 (1).
    Dans cet article, j’aborde la question de la notion d’ontologie chez Charles Taylor. Je constate, dans un premier temps, l’abandon par Taylor du point de vue anthropocentrique, ainsi que l’adoption d’une perspective non-anthropocentrique. Je remets ensuite en question l’interprétation de Stephen White, en insistant sur le fait qu’elle ne parvient pas à mettre en valeur l’inspiration métaphysique de la pensée de Taylor. J’estime, en conclusion, que Taylor s’appuie fondamentalement sur un mode d’argumentation métaphysique qui est sous-estimé lorsqu’on le présente comme (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Kant's moral philosophy.Robert N. Johnson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of rationality he dubbed the “Categorical Imperative” (CI). Immorality thus involves a violation of the CI and is thereby irrational. Other philosophers, such as Locke and Hobbes, had also argued that moral requirements are based on standards of rationality. However, these standards were either desirebased instrumental principles of rationality or based on sui generis rational intuitions. Kant agreed with many of his predecessors that an analysis of practical reason (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  • Emotions and Passions in the Discipline of International Relations.Jean-Marc Coicaud - 2014 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 15 (3):485-513.
    The article focuses on how emotions and passions are addressed in the field of international relations. As such it makes three main points. First, the article argues that, although presupposed in mainstream international relations, because of the influence of positivism emotions and passions have tended to be overlooked. Second, it makes the point that in recent years scholars with constructivist leanings have been increasingly interested in taking emotions and passions seriously as an academic area of research. Third, and finally, the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Strong evaluation and weak ontology. The predicament of Charles Taylor.Michiel Meijer - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (5):440-459.
    This paper aims to come to grips with the rich philosophy of Charles Taylor by focusing on his concept of ‘strong evaluation’. I argue that a close examination of this term brings out more clearly the continuing tensions in his writings as a whole. I trace back the origin of strong evaluation in Taylor’s earliest writings, and continue by laying out the different philosophical themes that revolve around it. Next, the focus is on the separate arguments in which strong evaluation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Does Charles Taylor have a Nietzsche problem?Michiel Meijer - 2017 - Constellations 24 (3):372-386.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation