Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Interaction, not gravitation.Richard Schlegel - 1976 - Foundations of Physics 6 (4):435-438.
    Cannon and Jensen assert that data from different national time laboratories give a test of the interaction interpretation of special relativity theory. That interpretation is to be applied, however, to clocks in relative uniform motion, and therefore is not tested by the time-rate effects associated with different terrestrial locations of clocks. Those effects are described by the general theory of relativity, and arise with differences in gravitational potential and state of circular motion of the clocks. An argument by the authors (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Superposition in quantum and relativity physics—An interaction interpretation of special relativity theory: Part III. [REVIEW]Richard Schlegel - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (2):197-215.
    With the interaction interpretation, the Lorentz transformation of a system arises with selection from a superposition of its states in an observation-interaction. Integration of momentum states of a mass over all possible velocities gives the rest-mass energy. Static electrical and magnetic fields are not found to form such a superposition and are to be taken as irreducible elements. The external superposition consists of those states that are reached only by change of state of motion, whereas the internal superposition contains all (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • An empirical test of the interaction interpretation of the theory of relativity.W. H. Cannon & O. G. Jensen - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (2):217-227.
    This paper presents an empirical test of Schlegel's “interaction interpretation” of the theory of special relativity. Analysis of the UTC time scales maintained at various observatory sites over the world indicates that neither Schlegel's “interaction interpretation” of the theory of relativity nor the conventional “space-time coordinate transformation interpretation” of relativity can significantly improve agreement between the UTC time scales. Instead evidence for the effects of accelerations on clock rates is suggested.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation