Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Formalism in Austrian‐school welfare economics: Another pretense of knowledge?David L. Prychitko - 1993 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 7 (4):567-592.
    Contemporary Austrian‐school economists reject neoclassical welfare theory for being founded on the benchmark of a perfectly competitive general equilibrium, and instead favor a formal theory deemed consistent with the notions of radical subjectivism and disequilibrium analysis. Roy Cordato advances a bold free‐market benchmark by which to formally assess social welfare, economic efficiency, and externalities issues. Like all formalist, a priori theory, however, Cordato's reformulation cannot meet its own standards, being theoretically and empirically flawed, and perhaps ideologically suspect.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Anti‐antitrust: Ideology or economics? Reply to Scherer.Dominick T. Armentano - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (1):29-39.
    F.M. Scherer has not effectively rebutted my subjectivist criticism of the standard microeconomic welfare model; Scherer's historical reference to what Congress (allegedly) believed is irrelevant to the theoretical concerns raised by subjectivism. Nor does my “principal” criticism of antitrust policy rests on “philosophical foundations”; my principal criticism rests on conventional economic analysis and a detailed economic history of the classic antitrust cases. My conclusion that the electrical equipment conspiracy of the late 1950s had no significant effect on market prices is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations