Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Mental probability logic.Niki Pfeifer & Gernot D. Kleiter - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):98-99.
    We discuss O&C's probabilistic approach from a probability logical point of view. Specifically, we comment on subjective probability, the indispensability of logic, the Ramsey test, the consequence relation, human nonmonotonic reasoning, intervals, generalized quantifiers, and rational analysis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Linguistic quantifiers modeled by Sugeno integrals.Mingsheng Ying - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence 170 (6-7):581-606.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Fuzzy set and possibility theory-based methods in artificial intelligence.Didier Dubois & Henri Prade - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 148 (1-2):1-9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Agent-oriented epistemic reasoning: Subjective conditions of knowledge and belief.Daniel G. Schwartz - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 148 (1-2):177-195.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Syllogisms and 5-Square of Opposition with Intermediate Quantifiers in Fuzzy Natural Logic.Petra Murinová & Vilém Novák - 2016 - Logica Universalis 10 (2-3):339-357.
    In this paper, we provide an overview of some of the results obtained in the mathematical theory of intermediate quantifiers that is part of fuzzy natural logic. We briefly introduce the mathematical formal system used, the general definition of intermediate quantifiers and define three specific ones, namely, “Almost all”, “Most” and “Many”. Using tools developed in FNL, we present a list of valid intermediate syllogisms and analyze a generalized 5-square of opposition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Syllogistic reasoning with intermediate quantifiers.Niki Pfeifer & Gernot D. Kleiter - manuscript
    A system of intermediate quantifiers (“Most S are P”, “m/n S are P”) is proposed for evaluating the rationality of human syllogistic reasoning. Some relations between intermediate quantifiers and probabilistic interpretations are discussed. The paper concludes by the generalization of the atmosphere, matching and conversion hypothesis to syllogisms with intermediate quantifiers. Since our experiments are currently still running, most of the paper is theoretical and intended to stimulate psychological studies.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark