Pressing and urgent domestic problems were the justification for L. Cornelius Sulla's election to the dictatorship in 82b.c.He responded with an extensive legislative programme which reorganized the judicial and legislative processes of theres publica. While there is agreement, in broad terms, about the nature of these changes, their purpose and significance remain debated. None the less, there is general consensus that the Senate's role in Sulla'sres publicawas enhanced in comparison with earlier periods. This conclusion is based on the increase in (...) the size of the Senate; on the monopoly it resumed of judicial decision-making in theiudicia publica; and on the extension, in practice, of its legislative capacity, given that its decrees could not be vetoed by tribunes of the plebs, who had also lost their capacity to put forward legislation. Flower offers a recent and concise summary: ‘This new “consensus” of Sulla was based on force and on the necessity of agreeing with Sulla himself, and subsequently with his new, mighty senate that was expected to wield unprecedented power and absolute authority.’. (shrink)