Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Reclaiming Agency, Recovering Change? An Exploration of the Practice Theory of Theodore Schatzki.Raymond Caldwell - 2012 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (3):283-303.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Wittgenstein + Heidegger on the stream of life.Theodore R. Schatzki - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):307 – 328.
    This paper combines views of Wittgenstein and Heidegger into an account of mind/ action. It does this by suggesting that these two philosophers be viewed in part as descendants of Life?philosophy (Lebensphilosophie). Part I describes the conception of life that informs and emerges from these thinkers. Parts Two and Three detail particular aspects of this conception: Wittgenstein on the constitution of states of life and Heidegger on the flow?structure of the stream of life. The Conclusion offers reasons for believing their (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Practices and actions a Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens.Theodore R. Schatzki - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):283-308.
    This article criticizes Bourdieu's and Giddens's overintellectualizing accounts of human activity on the basis of Wittgenstein's insights into practical under standing. Part 1 describes these two theorists' conceptions of a homology between the organization of practices (spatial-temporal manifolds of action) and the governance of individual actions. Part 2 draws on Wittgenstein's discussions of linguistic definition and following a rule to criticize these conceptions for ascribing content to the practical understanding they claim governs action. Part 3 then suggests an alternative, Wittgensteinian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Winch, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a critical social theory.Nigel Pleasants - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):78-91.
    The received understanding of Winch’s critique of social science is that he propounded a radically relativist, anti-explanatory and a-critical conception of the legitimate task of ‘social studies’. This conception is presumed to be predicated upon an extension of Wittgenstein’s critique of philosophy. I argue, against this view, that Winch reads Wittgenstein through a Kantian framework, and that in fact he advanced a rigorously essentialist and universalist picture of ‘social phenomena’. It is Winch’s underlying Kantian metaphysics that has made his ideas (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations