Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Sexual division and the new mythology: Goethe and Schelling.Stefani Engelstein - 2020 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (3):1-24.
    The new mythology for which the German Romantic period called was not envisioned as antithetical to empiricism or experiential/experimental knowledge, but rather as emerging in dialogue with it to form a cultural foundation for such inquiry. Central to the mytho-scientific project were problematic theories of sexual division and generativity that established cultural baselines. This article examines the mythological investments of two influential thinkers of the period—Goethe and Schelling. It then analyzes Goethe’s unique merger of mythological approaches to sex and generation (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The German Philosophical Scene.Klaus Hartmann - 1984 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 15 (3):301-306.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Kant and Schelling on Blumenbach’s formative drive.Naomi Fisher - 2021 - Intellectual History Review 31 (3):391-409.
    Blumenbach’s epigenetic theory, particularly his concept of the formative drive, was appropriated by both Kant and Schelling. Kant’s third Critique endorsement of Blumenbach’s formative drive shows him to be close to Schelling’s conception of nature, since it is evidence of his distance from an artifactual conception of teleology. Schelling also draws on this concept of the formative drive, making the structures operative in the formative drive the explanatory ground of all natural forces and processes, thereby supplying the unity between the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Spinoza in German Idealism: Rethinking Reception and Creation in Philosophy.María Jimena Solé - 2021 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 13 (1):21-33.
    It is a widely accepted idea that German Idealism stands on two pillars: Kant and Spinoza. The aim of this essay is to critically reflect on this way of understanding the history of philosophy through a study of the reception of Spinoza in the early writings of Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. This analysis will show that each of them builds a different image of Spinoza that is not based on the scholarly study of his works, but rather deeply conditioned by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • De la génesis de lo sensible a partir de lo inteligible.Francisco Prata Gaspar - 2017 - Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 54:85-115.
    Es conocida la crítica de Schelling de que la doctrina de la ciencia habría aniquilado cualquier concepto de naturaleza viva, reduciéndola a un simple obstáculo que debía ser superado con miras a la realización de los fines morales de la razón. ¿Acaso tiene razón Schelling después de todo? Este artículo pretende refutar esta crítica schellinguiana, mostrando no solo que a la doctrina de la ciencia no se le puede imputar esta falta, sino que ésta deduce, a partir de una estructura (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • (1 other version)"Schelling's metaphysics of the absolute self as" an ethics à la Spinoza".Luis Fernando Cardona Suárez - 2011 - Universitas Philosophica 28 (57):87-122.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Adorno and Schelling on the art–nature relation.Camilla Flodin - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):176-196.
    When it comes to the relationship between art and nature, research on Adorno’s aesthetics usually centres on his discussion of Kant and Hegel. While this reflects Adorno’s own position – his comprehension of this relationship is to a large extent developed through a critical re-reading of both the Kantian and the Hegelian position – I argue that we are able to gain important insights into Adorno’s aesthetics and the central art–nature relation by reading his ideas in the light of Schelling’s (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Fichte e Schelling em confronto – filosofia da reflexão ou não?Francisco Prata Gaspar - 2015 - Doispontos 12 (2).
    O objetivo do artigo é apresentar a discussão entre Fichte e Schelling em torno do conflito entre o idealismo transcendental da doutrina-da-ciência e a filosofia-da-natureza do Identitätssystem. Buscamos compreender, de um ponto de vista fichteano, se e em que medida é possível afirmar que a doutrina-da-ciência é uma filosofia da reflexão, tal como entendida por Schelling. Para tanto, em um primeiro momento, serão expostas as críticas de Schelling a Fichte, como ele progressivamente se afasta em relação à filosofia transcendental e (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reconciling Leibnizian Monadology and Kantian Criticism.Richard Mark Fincham - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (6):1033-1055.
    This paper explores systematic parallels between the criticisms of Kantian cognitive dualism provided by Salomon Maimon within his 'Essay on Transcendental Philosophy' of 1790 and F.W.J. Schelling within his 'General Overview of the Most Recent Philosophical Literature' of 1797. It discusses how both Maimon and Schelling suggest that the difficulties with Kant's cognitive dualism are so severe that they can only be resolved by recourse to a Leibnizian position, in which sensibility and understanding, and matter and form, arise from one (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation