Switch to: References

Citations of:

On Religious Ethics

In The Blackwell companion to religious ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 1--15 (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Medieval Consideration and Moral Pace.David A. Clairmont - 2013 - Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):79-111.
    This essay examines the relationship between virtue and understandings of time through a comparative examination of two medieval Christian writers, Bernard of Clairvaux and Thomas Aquinas. By locating temporal dimensions of virtue primarily in discussions of prudence, this essay compares Thomas's account of the virtue of counsel as preparatory to prudent judgment with Bernard's earlier account of consideration as an integrating virtue that coordinates an examination of physical surroundings and social responsibilities with an examination of one's own inner life and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The art of war corpus and chinese just war ethics past and present.Ping-Cheung Lo - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):404-446.
    The idea of “just war” is not alien to Chinese thought. The term “yi zhan” (usually translated as “just war” or “righteous war” in English) is used in Mencius, was renewed by Mao Zedong, and is still being used in China today (zhengyi zhanzheng). The best place to start exploring this Chinese idea is in the enormous Art of War corpus in premodern China, of which the Seven Military Classics is the best representative. This set of treatises served as the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Judging others: History, ethics, and the purposes of comparison.Aaron Stalnaker - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
    The most interesting and perilous issue at present in comparative religious ethics is comparative ethical judgment—when and how to judge others, if at all. There are understandable historical and conceptual reasons for the current tendency to prefer descriptive over normative work in comparative religious ethics. However, judging those we study is inescapable—it can be suppressed or marginalized but not eliminated. Therefore, the real question is how to judge others (and ourselves) well, not whether to judge. Instead of bringing supposedly universal (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations