Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Virtue Ethics, Positive Psychology, and a New Model of Science and Engineering Ethics Education.Hyemin Han - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):441-460.
    This essay develops a new conceptual framework of science and engineering ethics education based on virtue ethics and positive psychology. Virtue ethicists and positive psychologists have argued that current rule-based moral philosophy, psychology, and education cannot effectively promote students’ moral motivation for actual moral behavior and may even lead to negative outcomes, such as moral schizophrenia. They have suggested that their own theoretical framework of virtue ethics and positive psychology can contribute to the effective promotion of motivation for self-improvement by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Teaching research ethics and working together.Professor Michael S. Pritchard - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):367-371.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Challenge of Research Ethics Education in the University Setting.Brian Schrag - 2012 - Teaching Ethics 12 (2):1-21.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula.Vivian Weil - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):501-507.
    A focus on standards for assessing proposals for online teaching of practical and professional ethics provides an approach to standards for raising the level of online teaching. Intellectual merit, broad impact, and integration of research and teaching featuring a high level of interactivity are key criteria for evaluation. Especially noted is research that can serve to prepare instructors, to enrich the content of courses, and to stimulate further research. Yet raising the level of online teaching hinges on developing easy access (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective online education.Stephanie J. Bird & Joan E. Sieber - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):323-328.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Acclimating International Graduate Students to Professional Engineering Ethics.Katherine Austin Byron Newberry, Greta Gorsuch William Lawson & Thomas Darwin - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):171-194.
    This article describes the education portion of an ongoing grant-sponsored education and research project designed to help graduate students in all engineering disciplines learn about the basic ethical principles, rules, and obligations associated with engineering practice in the United States. While the curriculum developed for this project is used for both domestic and international students, the educational materials were designed to be sensitive to the specific needs of international graduate students. In recent years, engineering programs in the United States have (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Teaching research ethics and working together: Commentary on “pedagogical objectives in teaching research ethics in science and engineering”.Michael S. Pritchard - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):367-371.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Purple Dragons and Yellow Toadstools a Versatile Exercise for Introducing Students to Negotiated Consensus.Brian P. Coppola, India C. Plough & Huai Sun - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1261-1269.
    An activity called Purple Dragons and Yellow Toadstools, originally reported in 1987 as a training activity for jurors, was adapted as a priming exercise for a unit on teaching research ethics with undergraduate students. In this activity, learners develop skills for building negotiated consensus. The procedure involves individuals’ ranking 10–15 moral transgressions and/or legal violations followed by a small group discussion in order to arrive at an agreed-upon ranking by the team. The framework has proved to be quite flexible, adaptable (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark